What are Iran’s latest conditions to end its war with the US?

A Dual-Track Strategy Amidst Escalation

Tehran has officially communicated a new set of seven conditions to the United States via Qatari mediators, marking a critical juncture in the ongoing conflict that has roiled global energy markets. Mohsen Rezaei, secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, confirmed that these terms have been delivered to Washington, with the Iranian leadership now awaiting a formal response from President Donald Trump. This diplomatic overture, however, is underscored by a bellicose warning from Iranian officials who insist that the nation is more battle-hardened than at the onset of hostilities and remains fully prepared for a 'decisive war' should negotiations fail.

The current impasse follows the expiration of a 60-day memorandum of understanding (MoU) in August, which had previously provided a fragile framework for de-escalation. Since the collapse of that agreement, the conflict has intensified, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz, a vital maritime chokepoint that Iran has effectively shuttered. The resulting disruption to global shipping and the concurrent blockade of Iranian ports have pushed oil prices beyond the $100-per-barrel threshold, heightening the urgency for international intermediaries like Qatar and Pakistan to facilitate a breakthrough.

Core Demands and Diplomatic Hurdles

At the heart of Iran’s proposal are three primary pillars: a comprehensive end to the war across all regional fronts, the release of frozen Iranian financial assets, and the immediate lifting of the U.S. naval blockade. While the full list of seven conditions remains partially opaque, reports suggest they mirror previous demands for non-interference in internal affairs, the cessation of military strikes against Iranian allies in Lebanon and Yemen, and guarantees against the deployment of additional U.S. forces in the region. These demands represent a significant challenge for the Trump administration, which has maintained a policy of maximum pressure through sanctions and military posturing.

It is in Washington’s interest to accept these conditions. Trump’s threats will not achieve any results. We are prepared for a decisive war.

The inclusion of these specific terms suggests that Tehran is seeking a return to the status quo ante, albeit with stronger security guarantees. Iranian officials, including Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, have been unequivocal that the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed to international traffic until these conditions are met. This stance effectively holds global energy security hostage to the success of the current diplomatic exchanges, leaving little room for the incremental progress favored by Western negotiators.

The Shadow of Nuclear Proliferation

Beyond the immediate military and economic concerns, the conflict has cast a long shadow over the future of nuclear non-proliferation. Secretary Rezaei recently signaled that continued U.S. and Israeli pressure could force Tehran to reconsider its adherence to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). While he emphasized that no formal decision to withdraw has been made, the rhetoric marks a significant escalation in the psychological warfare accompanying the kinetic conflict, suggesting that Iran is willing to leverage its nuclear potential as a bargaining chip.

This potential shift in nuclear policy comes as satellite imagery and intelligence reports continue to monitor Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. The international community remains deeply concerned that the breakdown of diplomatic channels could lead to a permanent abandonment of the fatwa issued by the late Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, which prohibits the development of nuclear weapons. Such a move would fundamentally alter the regional security architecture and likely trigger a more aggressive response from the United States and its regional allies.

Regional Impact and Future Outlook

The economic fallout of the conflict is being felt globally, with the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the instability in the Red Sea creating a supply chain crisis for oil-dependent nations. Saudi Arabia and other regional actors are watching the negotiations closely, as the outcome will dictate the future of maritime security and the stability of their own energy exports. The involvement of Qatar and Pakistan as mediators highlights the desperate need for neutral ground in a conflict that has seen both sides dig in for a long-term war of attrition.

As the world awaits President Trump’s response, the situation remains volatile. Military analysts note that both sides have identified each other's strategic vulnerabilities, and the risk of miscalculation remains high. Whether the current diplomatic push leads to a renewed ceasefire or a further descent into 'decisive' conflict will depend on the willingness of both Washington and Tehran to compromise on their core security and economic demands.